CLINIC DECONSTRUCTION
The control analysis off the psichoanalysis postmodern

MORESCO Mercedes


To say "control analysis " results a bit ambiguous, since it refers to the analysis on the once hand and to the other hand without being any of them.

But neither "supervision" has to do with the idea of ready to start of the clinic "ready" not to be blind, since there is no "vision" or "super", only the hearing of a text brought by the supervisor.

I have to admit that between teaching and the temptation of analyzing there is an endless number of possible attitudes.

It is difficult the division of a clinic hearing which may not be teaching but transmission. Although doesn't mean so it grows naturally out of what is bean called "experience". But "the experience is not without its ignorance" (1)

He who asks for a hearing about the direction of the cure of his patients, knows that he is being exposed, but he doesn't come to be analyzed, it is supposed that he is being analyzed somewhere else.

Working on the clinic means reviewing the difficulties and separating those identifying spaces in which the transfer go caught by blindness and deafness.

The intervention and interpretation time (Suspension, for one) can be always questioned if they were made in the right moment they will be seen according to their effects, sooner or later. Not everything leaves a trace some are always remembered, others have never been heard. There are some interventions unperceptible that we have to update, and others like gestures, smiles, and so on that produce an effect beyond our intention. Some words that shouldn't have been said, an others which were too quiet. How can be said that an analytic act took place?.

When the analyst is deaf the patient kuits. The patient believes that the analyst knows about his sorrow and pain an that is why he is going to cure him. That first impression of the analysis has to be kept, but it shouldn't last forever. it is hard for the analyst to be in that position. since this situation may lead him to "be" instead of leading him to "think"..

The postmodern psichoanalysis finds an analyst who is alone in his act. He is always alone because he doesn't have references to say what he says. This doesn't exempt the analyst from the importance of his background but it gives him the responsibility to know that each case is unique. Postmodern analyst who expects for the unexpected who listens to broken discourse, who analysis, who risks his own word who has found out that he is not who he thought he was.

That is how he writes, following a trace which has been already marked, reading it is not enough, reading based on the other's word based on the important issues that the analyst puts a play. Writing means a mark. The analyst, he has to write,

(1) Jacques Lacan "El acto psicoanalítico", Seminario inédito.

 

 

Mercedes Moresco

 

 

so this could be called an analytic act. Let's say that this role that the analyst has put

him in a false position towards the knowledge situation. It is a false act since he himself as a subject can't be when the act is done. in that way there is not possible act. To be honest means to admit that only sometimes we really carry out our role. it would be too hard to believe that we are al that time apart of our own conflicts. Speaking less helps us to show less. The analysis provides a kind of screens as regards knowledge an should be used for the other's production and not to cover it. The analyst's job will be focused on "I lose" which marks the transit of the analyst within his analysis. then there could be a kind of "I write" an "I read". "I lose" is what the analysis is about.

And the supervision can't be from the "case". There aren't final points, only lines to be followed, isolated situations that are joined by the analyst. That is why I 'd rather have incomplete presentations, which show the conflicts to the analyst, which ask questions mainly to the transfer. It is an "unwoven" task in which it is not necessary to start from the very beginning.

It is not important the chronological order of the facts but the special making that the hearing can do and that leads to the control analysis. There is reading of a text that the analyst has built about the patient without realizing so.

The psichoanalytic technique, which doesn't provide us with certainty, but gives time to reflect upon and justifies the produced effects.

The control analysis or supervision or clinic deconstruction, term that I personally propose to name this, it is the space to listen to the clinic, may be it might help to undo certain transfers that block.

Clinic deconstruction based on an analysis which prefers the frame, more than the family soap operas which do not lose meaning. This space to listen to the clinic, can be a transmision not of something theoretical but something questioned. That is why is much more a the deconstruction, since the "control" would come from each patient and the teaching that they give us when we lose their text.

Inter lines we will see that the value of the questioning is in the experience of the questions.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Jacques Lacan: El acto analítico"Seminario inédito

Jacques Derrida: "Del espíritu"Pre textos 1989

Gianni Vattimo: "Más allá de la interpretación"Paidós 1995

Moustapha Safouan: "Jacques Lacan y la cuestión de la formación de los analistas" Paidos 1985.

Jacques Lacan: "Escritos"Siglo XXI 1971

Traducido por: Andrea Rapetti